Navigating Alaska’s sustainable energy without the Jenga effect

James Kaufman

COMMENTARY

As we navigate Alaska’s path to a more sustainable energy future, I’m reminded of the delicate balance required in the game of Jenga. Much like a precarious Jenga tower, Alaska’s energy landscape calls for careful planning to ensure both progress and stability in our quest for a cleaner, more diversified and sustainable energy future.

My deep dive into Alaska’s clean energy transition has taken me to a cumulative month’s worth of alternative energy conferences this year. Enthusiastic speakers passionately advocate for replacing carbon-producing energy sources with clean, sustainable alternatives. While I wholeheartedly endorse this endeavor, we must be cognizant of the potential pitfalls that could undermine our progress. We must pay attention to all aspects of energy provision: sources, generation, transmission and storage. Let me be clear: I am a strong proponent of increasing Alaska’s use of cleaner energy sources. Recent legislative victories underscore our commitment to this transition. A significant milestone is the passage of HB 62, a bill I had the privilege to work on alongside Rep. Bryce Edgmon. This legislation cements the Renewable Energy Fund’s permanence in Alaska, facilitating sustainable investments in cost-effective renewable alternatives and assisting communities across the state to reduce and stabilize their cost of energy.

Login to continue reading article